The Link Between Emotional Labor and Occupational Stress Among Cabin Crew Members

In the airline sector, cabin crew personnel are essential for guaranteeing passenger safety and comfort, delivering customer service, and overseeing in-flight operations. To sustain a favorable environment and maintain elevated customer service standards, cabin crew personnel must do emotional labor, which involves managing emotions to conform to organizational expectations (Hochschild, 1983). Emotional labor is crucial for providing acceptable service; yet, it also leads to occupational stress, as crew members must incessantly regulate and repress their emotions, even under difficult circumstances (Grandey et al., 2013). This article analyzes the relationship between emotional work and occupational stress in cabin crew, investigating the distinct obstacles they encounter, the psychological consequences of emotional control, and methods to alleviate the adverse effects of emotional labor on their well-being.

 

Emotional Labor: Definition and Significance for Cabin Crew

Emotional labor refers to the management of emotions to meet the emotional demands of a work, often including the expression of sentiments that do not authentically represent one's true emotions (Hochschild, 1983). Emotional labor includes surface acting, in which people alter their external displays without altering their true feelings, or deep acting, where they strive to adjust their interior emotional states to correspond with the mandated presentation (Grandey, 2000). Emotional labor is fundamental for cabin crew, who must continually exhibit warmth, friendliness, and patience, irrespective of their own emotions or passenger conduct (Kim, 2021).

The airline sector imposes significant demands on cabin staff to provide outstanding service while regulating customer conduct, often necessitating the resolution of complaints, conflict management, and de-escalation of crises. The persistent need for emotional regulation may lead to occupational stress, as cabin crew must maintain a composed and optimistic disposition despite problems such as disruptive guests, extended working hours, and physical fatigue (Wu et al., 2020). Furthermore, emotional labor intensifies during emergencies, such as flight delays or safety problems, when crew members are required to convey calmness and comfort to alleviate passenger worry (Sohn et al., 2019).

 

Occupational Stress Among Cabin Crew.

Occupational stress denotes the negative physical and emotional responses that arise when employment demands surpass an individual's capacity to manage (Leka et al., 2003). Occupational stress is a common concern for cabin crew, often stemming from the distinctive working circumstances inherent in aviation. Irregular working hours, long-haul flights, time-zone changes, and the significant responsibility for passenger safety add to the stress faced by cabin crew members (Baker et al., 2022). Moreover, cabin crew often experience job instability owing to the unpredictable dynamics of the aviation sector, which intensifies emotions of stress and anxiety (Lee et al., 2020).

The Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, proposed by Demerouti et al. (2001), elucidates the interplay between job demands, resources, and occupational stress. The JD-R model posits that stress arises when work demands are elevated and the resources to manage these demands are inadequate. The emotional pressures of addressing passenger expectations and the absence of control over work schedules contribute to an atmosphere that fosters occupational stress for cabin crew. Emotional labor, as an additional work need, intensifies the stress experienced by cabin crew, who often lack the resources, including support systems and sufficient rest, to adequately handle these demands (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007).

 

The Correlation Between Emotional Labor and Occupational Stress

Studies indicate that emotional labor may substantially exacerbate professional stress, especially when workers must do surface acting (Grandey et al., 2013). Surface acting, whereby people exhibit emotions they do not authentically experience, is linked to emotional dissonance—a contradiction between internal sentiments and external manifestations (Hülsheger & Schewe, 2011). Cabin personnel often engage in surface acting to fulfill the expectations of passengers and superiors. This emotional contradiction may result in emotions of inauthenticity, irritation, and psychological strain, hence contributing to occupational stress (Kim, 2021).

The Conservation of Resources (COR) hypothesis, established by Hobfoll (1989), offers a framework for comprehending the relationship between emotional labor and occupational stress. The COR hypothesis posits that stress arises when people sense a danger to their resources or suffer a loss of resources. under the realm of emotional work, cabin crew members invest considerable emotional energies to manage their emotions and maintain a pleasant disposition, even under challenging circumstances. Gradually, this erosion of emotional resources may result in fatigue, burnout, and heightened professional stress (Hobfoll, 1989).

Research indicates that cabin crew workers who often participate in surface acting are more susceptible to burnout, defined by emotional tiredness, depersonalization, and diminished personal success (Brotheridge & Grandey, 2002). The constant need to repress authentic emotions and exhibit positive sentiments may be intellectually and physically draining, resulting in stress-related symptoms such as weariness, irritation, and perhaps depression (Hülsheger & Schewe, 2011). Furthermore, emotional labor may adversely affect work satisfaction and organizational commitment, as employees may see themselves as underpaid or harbor resentment towards the emotional demands of their positions (Lee et al., 2020).

 

Psychological Impacts of Emotional Labor on Flight Attendants

The psychological impact of emotional work on cabin staff may be significant, since they must regulate their own emotions alongside those of passengers. The burden of emotional regulation may result in emotional exhaustion, a fundamental aspect of burnout marked by mental tiredness and a sensation of emotional depletion (Maslach & Jackson, 1981). Emotional weariness is especially pertinent for cabin staff, who often endure extended hours in close quarters with guests, with few chances for recuperation between flights (Wu et al., 2020).

Alongside emotional tiredness, cabin crew workers who often do emotional labor may also encounter depersonalization, characterized by a distant or cynical disposition towards passengers and their duties. Depersonalization often serves as a coping strategy to alleviate the stress associated with emotional work, enabling people to detach from the emotional requirements of their positions. This alienation may result in decreased work satisfaction and lower empathy, eventually affecting the quality of service delivered to passengers (Grandey et al., 2013). 

The influence of emotional labor on cabin crew's mental health is intensified by insufficient social support and limited control over their work environment. Research indicates that individuals devoid of support from supervisors and peers are more susceptible to the adverse impacts of emotional labor, as they possess insufficient resources to manage the demands of their positions (Sohn et al., 2019). The seclusion inherent in cabin crew employment, often far from family and friends, may intensify feelings of loneliness and amplify the stress linked to emotional labor.

 

Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Emotional Labor on Flight Attendants

Airlines may use several techniques to alleviate the adverse effects of emotional work on cabin crew, therefore lowering stress and enhancing employee well-being. Initially, offering training in emotional regulation strategies, like mindfulness and cognitive reappraisal, may assist cabin crew in more successfully managing the emotional challenges of their position. Mindfulness training has shown efficacy in reducing stress and enhancing emotional resilience by fostering non-judgmental awareness of emotions, enabling people to confront tough circumstances with more calm (Hülsheger et al., 2013).

Secondly, cultivating a friendly workplace may enhance cabin crew's sense of worth and reduce feelings of isolation. Airlines may establish peer support programs, enabling cabin crew to exchange experiences and coping skills with their peers. These programs may foster camaraderie and provide social support to cabin crew, which has been shown to mitigate the adverse effects of emotional work (Brotheridge & Grandey, 2002). Furthermore, facilitating access to mental health resources, including counseling services, may provide cabin crew with a secure environment to address the difficulties of their position and get expert assistance when necessary.

Third, providing more adaptable work schedules and guaranteeing sufficient rest intervals between flights might assist cabin crew in recuperating from the physical and mental strains of their duties. Studies indicate that workers with autonomy over their schedules and enough recuperation time are less prone to burnout and emotional fatigue (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015). Enabling cabin crew to contribute to their work schedules and ensuring enough rest hours may alleviate the burdens of emotional labor and enhance overall worker satisfaction.

Ultimately, fostering a culture of empathy and acknowledgment inside the business helps enhance cabin crew's sense of appreciation and support. Acknowledging the emotional challenges faced by cabin crew and expressing gratitude for their contributions might strengthen their feeling of belonging and dedication to the business (Kim, 2021). By cultivating a workplace that prioritizes employee well-being, airlines can mitigate the adverse effects of emotional labor on cabin crew and enhance their overall job satisfaction and performance.

 

Reference

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007) The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), pp. 309-328.

Baker, S., Choi, S., & Kim, J. (2022) Occupational stress among airline crew: Risk factors and mitigation strategies. Journal of Aviation Psychology, 36(2), pp. 178-196.

Brotheridge, C. M., & Grandey, A. A. (2002) Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of “people work.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(1), pp. 17-39.

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) The Job Demands-Resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), pp. 499-512.

Grandey, A. A. (2000) Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), pp. 95-110.

Grandey, A. A., Diefendorff, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2013) Emotional labor in the 21st century: Diverse perspectives on emotion regulation at work. New York: Routledge.

Hochschild, A. R. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989) Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), pp. 513-524.

Hülsheger, U. R., Alberts, H. J., Feinholdt, A., & Lang, J. W. (2013) Benefits of mindfulness at work: The role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), pp. 310-325.

Hülsheger, U. R., & Schewe, A. F. (2011) On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: A meta-analysis of three decades of research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(3), pp. 361-389.

Kim, S. (2021) The effect of emotional labor on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention among airline cabin crew. Service Business, 15(2), pp. 271-292.

Lee, C., Son, M., & Lee, K. (2020) The impact of job insecurity on occupational stress and mental health: The case of cabin crew. Journal of Tourism Management Studies, 25(1), pp. 112-128.

Leka, S., Griffiths, A., & Cox, T. (2003) Work Organization & Stress: Systematic problem approaches for employers, managers, and trade union representatives. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981) The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 2(2), pp. 99-113.

Sohn, Y., Hong, S., & Song, H. (2019) Effects of emotional labor on burnout and job satisfaction among airline cabin crews. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, pp. 182-191.

Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015) Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), pp. S72-S103.

Wu, C., Tseng, M., & Liu, S. (2020) Occupational stress and job satisfaction of airline cabin crew: The moderating role of emotional intelligence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), p. 5434.